Decolonial Travel Guide Tanzania

Voluntourism and volunteer services – engagement with (side) effects?

Anna Mehlhorn

Every year, tens of thousands of young people from Germany travel to countries in the Global South with the desire to gain new experiences for life and do good at the same time. However, volunteer services are also criticised for reproducing stereotypical role models of helpers and recipients of aid and for perpetuating post-colonial power and dependency relationships between the Global North and Global South. But is all voluntary service the same?

The possibilities are numerous and often confusing for those interested. There are state-funded and regulated programmes such as the development policy voluntary service weltwärts (Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development), weltwärts (Federal Foreign Office) or the International Youth Voluntary Service Internationalen Jugendfreiwilligendienst (Federal Ministry of Education, Family, Seniors, Women and Youth). In addition, numerous commercial organisations and companies offer tourist trips combined with short-term volunteer assignments – so-called voluntourism.

How do state-regulated volunteer services differ from commercial voluntourism?

Voluntary services should benefit all those involved. A study by Brot für die Welt (2018) clearly shows that in voluntourism, the needs of paying customers are paramount, sometimes at the expense of child protection in local projects. In addition, local placement sites are often not involved in organisational processes. This can lead to volunteers replacing local workers or creating financial dependence on voluntourism donations. Placement sites often hope to receive donations that are to be raised by volunteers. If volunteers are not sufficiently aware of this and prepared for it, dependencies and conflicts of roles and interests arise. Overall, there is a lack of binding quality standards for voluntourism offers. weltwärts sponsors, on the other hand, are required to be part of quality associations. Quality seals such as QUIFT can create comparability and transparency for interested parties.

However, this educational work is indispensable in order to sensitize volunteers to prevailing conditions and their role in them and, ultimately, to equip them with the practical tools they need to question these (postcolonial) structures and help change them in the long term through hands-on training in voluntary service. This presents a great opportunity to make the encounters during voluntary service a starting point for further transformative engagement. However, this means that the responsibility for addressing unjust conditions within state volunteer programs cannot be shifted solely to the volunteers themselves.

Programmes such as weltwärts must question colonial notions of “development” and make decision-making and financing structures more equitable – not least in order to better meet their own standards for a partnership-based programme.

Weiterführende Informationen
  • Brot für die Welt (2018): Vom Freiwilligendienst zum Voluntourismus. Herausforderungen für die verantwortungsvolle Gestaltung eines wachsenden Reisetrends. Berlin, online: www.tourism-watch.de/dossiers/voluntourismus
  • Fischer, Jörn (2024): Freiwilligendienste im Ausland, In: Christoph Gille, Andrea Walter, Hartmut Brombach et al.: Zivilgesellschaftliches Engagement und Freiwilligendienste, S. 269-278, Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag.
  • Konzi, Kristina (2015): Postkoloniale Perspektiven auf „weltwärts“, Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag.